4.8 Article

Exposure to preindustrial, current and future atmospheric CO2 and temperature differentially affects growth and photosynthesis in Eucalyptus

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 303-319

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02003.x

Keywords

Eucalyptus; growth; high temperature; photosynthesis; subambient and elevated CO2

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP0879531]
  2. University of Western Sydney International Research Schemes Initiative (IRIS) [71827]
  3. National Science Foundation, Division of Integrative Organismal Systems [0517521]
  4. Boston University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate if Eucalyptus species have responded to industrial-age climate change, and how they may respond to a future climate, we measured growth and physiology of fast( E. saligna) and slow-growing (E. sideroxylon) seedlings exposed to preindustrial (290), current (400) or projected (650 mu L L-1) CO2 concentration ([CO2]) and to current or projected (current +4 degrees C) temperature. To evaluate maximum potential treatment responses, plants were grown with nonlimiting soil moisture. We found that: (1) E. sideroxylon responded more strongly to elevated [CO2] than to elevated temperature, while E. saligna responded similarly to elevated [CO2] and elevated temperature; (2) the transition from preindustrial to current [CO2] did not enhance eucalypt plant growth under ambient temperature, despite enhancing photosynthesis; (3) the transition from current to future [CO2] stimulated both photosynthesis and growth of eucalypts, independent of temperature; and (4) warming enhanced eucalypt growth, independent of future [CO2], despite not affecting photosynthesis. These results suggest large potential carbon sequestration by eucalypts in a future world, and highlight the need to evaluate how future water availability may affect such responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available