4.8 Article

Faster returns on 'leaf economics' and different biogeochemical niche in invasive compared with native plant species

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages 2171-2185

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02054.x

Keywords

biogeochemical niche; Hawaiian flora; invasive success; leaf economics; leaf elemental composition; LMA; nutrient stoichiometry; photosynthetic capacity

Funding

  1. University of Hawaii
  2. Spanish Government [CGL2006-04025/BOS, CSD2008-00040]
  3. Catalan Government [SGR 2009-458]
  4. Estonian Ministry of Education and Science [SF1090065s07]
  5. Spanish CSIC
  6. Estonian Academy of Sciences
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010023] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant-invasive success is one of the most important current global changes in the biosphere. To understand which factors explain such success, we compared the foliar traits of 41 native and 47 alien-invasive plant species in Oahu Island (Hawaii), a location with a highly endemic flora that has evolved in isolation and is currently vulnerable to invasions by exotic plant species. Foliar traits, which in most cases presented significant phylogenetic signal, i.e. closely related species tended to resemble each other due to shared ancestry, separated invasive from native species. Invasive species had lower leaf mass per area and enhanced capacities in terms of productivity (photosynthetic capacity) and nutrient capture both of macro- (N, P, K) and microelements (Fe, Ni, Cu and Zn). All these differences remain highly significant after removing the effects of phylogenetic history. Alien-invasive species did not show higher efficiency at using limiting nutrient resources, but they got faster leaf economics returns and occupied a different biogeochemical niche, which helps to explain the success of invasive plants and suggests that potential increases in soil nutrient availability might favor further invasive plant success.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available