4.8 Article

Acclimation to temperature and temperature sensitivity of metabolism by ectomycorrhizal fungi

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 1169-1180

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01555.x

Keywords

acclimation; carbon cycling; climate change; ectomycorrhizal fungi; global warming; Q(10); respiration; temperature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi contribute significantly to ecosystem respiration, but little research has addressed the effect of temperature on ECM fungal respiration. Some plants have the ability to acclimate to temperature such that long-term exposure to warmer conditions slows respiration at a given measurement temperature and long-term exposure to cooler conditions increases respiration at a given measurement temperature. We examined acclimation to temperature and temperature sensitivity (Q(10)) of respiration by ECM fungi by incubating them for a week at one of three temperatures and measuring respiration over a range of temperatures. Among the 12 ECM fungal isolates that were tested, Suillus intermedius, Cenococcum geophilum, and Lactarius cf. pubescens exhibited significant acclimation to temperature, exhibiting an average reduction in respiration of 20-45% when incubated at 23 degrees C compared with when incubated at 11 or 17 degrees C. The isolates differed significantly in their Q(10) values, which ranged from 1.67 to 2.56. We also found that half of the isolates significantly increased Q(10) with an increase in incubator temperature by an average of 15%. We conclude that substantial variation exists among ECM fungal isolates in their ability to acclimate to temperature and in their sensitivity to temperature. As soil temperatures increase, ECM fungi that acclimate may require less carbon from their host plants than fungi that do not acclimate. The ability of some ECM fungi to acclimate may partially ameliorate the anticipated positive feedback between soil respiration and temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available