4.7 Article

Global dry deposition of nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide inferred from space-based measurements

Journal

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
Volume 28, Issue 10, Pages 1025-1043

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014GB004805

Keywords

dry deposition; OMI; sulfur dioxide; nitrogen dioxide

Funding

  1. Environment Canada
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A method is developed to estimate global NO2 and SO2 dry deposition fluxes at high spatial resolution (0.1 degrees x0.1 degrees) using satellite measurements from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on the Aura satellite, in combination with simulations from the Goddard Earth Observing System chemical transport model (GEOS-Chem). These global maps for 2005-2007 provide a data set for use in examining global and regional budgets of deposition. In order to properly assess SO2 on a global scale, a method is developed to account for the geospatial character of background offsets in retrieved satellite columns. Globally, annual dry deposition to land estimated from OMI as NO2 contributes 1.5 0.5Tg of nitrogen and as SO2 contributes 13.7 4.0Tg of sulfur. Differences between OMI-inferred NO2 dry deposition fluxes and those of other models and observations vary from excellent agreement to an order of magnitude difference, with OMI typically on the low end of estimates. SO2 dry deposition fluxes compare well with in situ Clear Air Status and Trends Network-inferred flux over North America (slope=0.98, r=0.71). The most significant NO2 dry deposition flux to land per area occurs in the Pearl River Delta, China, at 13.9 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1), while SO2 dry deposition has a global maximum rate of 72.0 kg S ha(-1) yr(-1) to the east of Jinan in China's Shandong province. Dry deposition fluxes are explored in several urban areas, where NO2 contributes on average 9-36% and as much as 85% of total NOy dry deposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available