4.6 Article

Estimating extremes in climate change simulations using the peaks-over-threshold method with a non-stationary threshold

Journal

GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE
Volume 72, Issue 1-2, Pages 55-68

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.03.006

Keywords

climate change; extreme value analysis; global climate models; peaks-over-threshold method; quantile regression; Poisson process; extreme temperatures

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [205/06/1535, P209/10/2045]
  2. Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic [LC06024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper presents a methodology for estimating high quantiles of distributions of daily temperature in a non-stationary context, based on peaks-over-threshold analysis with a time-dependent threshold expressed in terms of regression quantiles. The extreme value models are applied to estimate 20-yr return values of maximum daily temperature over Europe in transient global climate model (GCM) simulations for the 21st century. A comparison of scenarios of changes in the 20-yr return temperatures based on the non-stationary peaks-over-threshold models with conventional stationary models is performed. It is demonstrated that the application of the stationary extreme value models in temperature data from GCM scenarios yields results that may be to a large extent biased, while the non-stationary models lead to spatial patterns that are robust and enable one to detect areas where the projected warming in the tail of the distribution of daily temperatures is largest. The method also allows splitting the projected warming of extremely high quantiles into two parts that reflect change in the location and scale of the distribution of extremes, respectively. Spatial patterns of the two components differ significantly in the examined climate change projections over Europe. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available