4.6 Article

The forcing of mean sea level variability around Europe

Journal

GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE
Volume 63, Issue 2-3, Pages 196-202

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.08.018

Keywords

mean sea level; cross-correlation; regional index; NAO; MOI; spatial coherency

Funding

  1. EC [EVRI-CT-2002-40025, GOCE 036961]
  2. ESEAS-RI
  3. NERC [soc010007] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [soc010007] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mean sea level variability around the European coasts is explored oil the basis of regional sea level indices derived through Empirical Orthogonal Function Analysis (EOF) of tide-gauge records. The regional indices are cross-correlated amongst themselves and against the major regional and climatic indices. The analysis is done for the whole year as well as seasonally. The effect of coherent atmospheric pressure signals is explored by comparing the results of the analysis before and after the data are Corrected for the atmospheric pressure effects. The North Atlantic Oscillation Index (NAO) and the Mediterranean Oscillation Index are the major regional indices which are found to be significantly correlated with sea level variability around Europe. Their Correlation is positive for the Northern European coast and negative for the Mediterranean coasts. The NAO influence causes an anticorrelation between northern and southern European sea level. This is stronger in winter and weakens significantly or disappears completely during the summer When the NAO influence was removed from the regional mean sea level indices the cross-correlation between the various regions was reduced. However, residual spatial coherency indicated that probably there are other mechanisms causing spatial coherency. No statistically significant correlation with the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) Was found. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available