4.6 Article

Absence of Oligodendroglial Glucosylceramide Synthesis does not Result in CNS Myelin Abnormalities or Alter the Dysmyelinating Phenotype of CGT-Deficient Mice

Journal

GLIA
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages 391-398

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/glia.20930

Keywords

oligodendrocyte; glycolipids; mouse models

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS027336, NS036866]
  2. National Multiple Sclerosis Society postdoctoral fellowship award
  3. VCU Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology Microscopy Facility
  4. NIH-NINDS [5P30NS047463]
  5. NIA [AG23168]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To examine the function of glycosphingolipids (GSLs) in oligodendrocytes, the myelinating cells of the central nervous system (CNS), mice were generated that lack oligodendroglial expression of UDP-glucose ceramide glucosyltransferase (encoded by Ugcg). These mice (Ugcg(flox/flox);Cnp/Cre) did not show any apparent clinical phenotype, their total brain and myelin extracts had normal GSL content, including ganglioside composition, and myelin abnormalities were not detected in their CNS. These data indicate that the elimination of gangliosides from oligodendrocytes is not detrimental to myelination. These mice were also used to asses the potential compensatory effect of hydroxyl fatty acid glucosylceramide (HFA-GlcCer) accumulation in UDP-galactose:ceramide galactosyltransferase (encoded by Cgt, also known as Ugt8a) deficient mice. At postnatal day 18, the phenotypic characteristics of the Ugcg(flox/flox);Cnp/Cre;Cgt(-/-) mutants, including the degree of hypomyelination, were surprisingly similar to that of Cgt(-/-) mice, suggesting that the accumulation of HFA-GlcCer in Qgt(-/-) mice does not modify their phenotype. These studies demonstrate that abundant, structurally intact myelin can form in the absence of glycolipids, which normally represent over 20% of the dry weight of myelin. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available