4.4 Review

Can the New Cooperative Medical Scheme promote rural elders' access to health-care services?

Journal

GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 239-245

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00702.x

Keywords

China; elderly; health-care system; New Cooperative Medical Scheme; rural

Funding

  1. Jiangsu University [JDR2008021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to examine the impact of the New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) on rural elders' access to health-care services. Articles were identified from PubMed, Elsevier, Wiley, EBSCO, EMBASE, SCI Expanded, ProQuest, Google, and CNKI which is the most informative database in Chinese, with the search terms rural, China, old, older, or elder, elderly, or aged, aging, medical insurance, or community-based medical insurance, or cooperative medical scheme. Related websites and yearbooks were searched as well. The NCMS has improved the health-care utilization of rural elders, and they have the highest satisfaction with it among all age groups. However, affordability difficulty remained the common barrier for the rural elderly to access quality health care, in spite of the special considerations given to the rural elderly, such as premium remission and free check-ups. Faced with ever-growing health challenges, some impoverished rural elders with poor physical health and functional limitations may lack sufficient access to basic health-care services. Followed by the provider payment reform initiated by the NCMS, a stricter regulation for doctors' prescriptions, clinical practice and disease management is needed to promote rural elders' access to health-care services. Health management for rural elders can be expected for the NCMS to promote rural elders' health-care access once a better coordination between the NCMS and health-care system can be achieved. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2011; 11: 239-245.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available