Journal
GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 310-316Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00772.x
Keywords
factor analysis; internal structure; item response theory; Mini-Mental State Examination; unidimensionality
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Aim: This study aimed to examine the validity and item-response characteristics of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), which is used for assessing cognitive function, in Japanese older adults. Methods: Factor analysis and item response analysis were carried out for MMSE responses (n = 1971) from older adults living in the community (n = 1339) or in a nursing home (n = 632), including Alzheimer-type dementia (n = 330), vascular dementia (n = 36), frontotemporal dementia (n = 7), mixed Alzheimer-type and frontotemporal type dementia (n = 27), and age-related cognitive decline (n = 29). When choosing the cut-off score of 23 points for the MMSE, sensitivity and specificity for each item were calculated. Results: A three-factor solution was found to be most appropriate by factor analysis: complex processing, simple processing and working memory. The item characteristics curves showed unidimensionality with high reproducibility. We identified a simplified scale comprising 10 items in all participants: naming, three-step command, registration, repeat a sentence, write a complete sentence, copies drawing of two polygons, orientation to place, delayed recall, orientation to timeand serial sevenstasks. Sensitivity and specificity for both yeartask and daytask were more than 90% (year: sensitivity 92.5%, specificity 96.3%; day: sensitivity 92.4%, specificity 91.7%). For the Alzheimer-type dementia patients, the five-factor solution was suggested by factor analysis and the MMSE also had unidimensionality in terms of level of difficulty. Conclusions: We found that the MMSE had multiple cognitive areas. We showed that the MMSE could be used as an essentially unidimensional measure of cognitive ability and the question about orientation to time might be useful in the simplest assessment to identify cognitive dysfunction. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2012; 12: 310-316.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available