Journal
GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 50-58Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00726.x
Keywords
gender difference; mobility limitation; physical function; walking speed
Categories
Funding
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19200047]
- Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19200047] Funding Source: KAKEN
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Aim: To examine gender differences in regards to the disagreement between walking speed and self-reported mobility limitations, and, furthermore, to explore the items that affect each physical function task by comparing slow walking speed and self-reported mobility limitation in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: The subjects consisted of 1381 community-dwelling men and women aged 65-84 years who were classified into four categories according to a combination of mobility status measured by a slow walking speed (usual gait speed < 1.0 m/ s) and self-reported mobility limitation (difficulty walking 1 km). The physical function tests comprised onelegged stance, tandem stance, functional reach, tandem walk, alternate step and five chair sit-to-stand. Results: The prevalence of limitations increased more rapidly with age in women than in men for five mobility tasks (P < 0.001). The percent difference between slow walking speed and self-reported mobility limitation was higher in women (24%) than men (19%). The multivariate logistic regression model showed that after adjusting for all covariates, the tandem walk, alternate step and five chair sit-to-stand were identified as effective physical function tests in regards to mobility status as measured by the difference between slow walking speed and self-reported mobility limitation (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Tandem walk, alternate step and five chair sit-to-stand are important effective items of physical function and permit good comparisons between slow walking speed and self-reported mobility limitation in community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2012; 12: 50-58.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available