4.5 Article

Microseismicity observed at a non-pressure-stimulated geothermal power plant

Journal

GEOTHERMICS
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 36-49

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.01.002

Keywords

Geothermal; Induced seismicity; Triggered seismicity

Funding

  1. Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics, Hanover [201-4500053605]
  2. MAGS project
  3. German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety [0325191A-F]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the North Alpine Foreland Basin, geothermal plants exploit a deep natural aquifer. Considering the low seismic hazard in this region, the non-pressure-stimulated, hydrothermal usage of this aquifer was generally assumed to be unproblematic with regard to induced seismicity. However, a series of five, partly felt shallow magnitude M-I> 2 earthquakes at a geothermal power plant near Munich, Germany, lead us to conduct a detailed study of the local microseismicity. Here, we present results from two years of data acquired with a local five station seismic network. More than 130 events have been detected with local magnitudes ranging from -0.8 to 2.4 and a magnitude of completeness of around 0. Absolute locations are calculated in a 3D velocity model and are improved by double-difference and Master-Event techniques. Hypocenters are located in basement rock underlying the geothermal target horizon, and in combination with estimates of focal mechanisms, they can be associated to existing fault zones pierced by the geothermal well. This study shows that even non-pressure-stimulated geothermal plants with good hydraulic parameters operated hydrothermally at low injection pressures are able to generate seismicity even in low seismic hazard settings, and has led to a change in paradigm for the demand for seismic monitoring at upcoming geothermal facilities in this area. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available