4.2 Article

SHRIMP U-Pb ages of detrital zircons in metasandstones of the Taean Formation, western Gyeonggi massif, Korea: Tectonic implications

Journal

GEOSCIENCES JOURNAL
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 99-109

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s12303-010-0011-7

Keywords

U-Pb zircon ages; Taean Formation; Gyeonggi massif; Imjingang belt; South China craton

Funding

  1. NRF-MEST [2010-0000296]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detrital zircons in three metasandstones of the Taean Formation, western Gyeonggi massif, Korea, were analyzed using a sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe (SHRIMP), in order to provide geochronologic constraints for the depositional age as well as the protolith ages. This formation mainly comprises the sandstone-mudstone units which experienced regional metamorphism at the transitional greenschist-amphibolite facies condition. The majority of detrital zircons yielded concordant ages defining four major age components: (1) Late Archean Early Proterozoic (2.5-2.4 Ga); (2) Middle to Earliest Late Proterozoic (1.0-0.9 Ga); (3) Middle Late Proterozoic (820-750 Ma); and (4) Silurian (similar to 430 Ma). The youngest group gives a weighted mean Pb-206/U-238 age of 431.3 +/- 4.1 Ma (n = 17), confirming the Upper Paleozoic deposition of the Taean Formation. Together with this Silurian peak, the presence of Middle to Late Proterozoic ages is characteristic for the source rock, suggesting that the western Gyeonggi massif could be correlative with the South China craton. On the other hand, the lack of Paleoproterozoic age of similar to 1.87 Ga is in marked contrast with its predominance in the basement rocks of central to eastern Gyeonggi massif. The overall distribution pattern of detrital zircon ages is consistent with that of the Devonian metasedimentary rock in the Imjingang belt, suggesting an extension of this collisional belt towards the south.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available