4.6 Article

Anisotropy of elastic wave velocities in deformed shales: Part 1-Experimental results

Journal

GEOPHYSICS
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages D75-D89

Publisher

SOC EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICISTS
DOI: 10.1190/1.2952744

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French agency for radioactive waste management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Elastic wave velocity measurements in the laboratory are used to assess the evolution of the microstructure of shales under triaxial stresses, which are representative of in situ conditions. Microstructural parameters such as crack aperture are of primary importance when permeability is a concern. The purpose of these experiments is to understand the micro-mechanical behavior of the Callovo-Oxfordian shale in response to external perturbations. The available experimental setup allows for the continuous, simultaneous measurement of five independent elastic wave velocities and two directions of strain (axial and circumferential), performed on the same cylindrical rock sample during deformation in an axisymmetric triaxial cell. The main results are (1) identification of the complete tensor of elastic moduli of the transversely isotropic shales using elastic wave velocity measurements, (2) assessment of the evolution of these moduli under triaxial loading, and (3) assessment of the evolution of the elastic anisotropy under loading in terms of Thomsen's parameters. This last outcome allows us to use the anisotropy of the elastic properties of this rock as an indicator of the evolution of its microstructure. In particular, epsilon in the dry case decreases from 0.5 (ambient pressure) toward 0.37 (55 MPa), while gamma and delta are almost insensitive to pressure. In the wet case, epsilon decreases from 0.3 (ambient pressure) toward 0.2 (55 MPa). Deviatoric stresses have a strong effect on epsilon, gamma, and delta variations. In this case, epsilon drops (both for the dry and wet conditions) when failure is approached.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available