4.7 Article

Morphologic Diversity of Martian Ripples: Implications for Large-Ripple Formation

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 45, Issue 19, Pages 10229-10239

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018GL079029

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FAS Division of Science of Harvard University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large ripples with meter-scale wavelengths are ubiquitous across Mars. Curiosity's traverse of the Bagnold Dune Field revealed a morphologic diversity of large Martian ripples that helps constrain their formative mechanism. Large ripples develop in isolated fields and on dunes. They form transversely and obliquely to longitudinally to the net sand-flux direction in unimodally and bimodally distributed very fine to very coarse sand. They have either straight or sinuous crestlines. Inactive ripples are covered with dust, whereas migrating ripples are dust free. Here we present a unifying view of ripples that form in near-bed sediment-transport conditions (encompassing fluid-drag and coarse-grained ripples) to explain the range of large-Martian-ripple morphologies and expand the use of bedforms as environmental indicators. Plain Language Summary Large sand ripples with meter-scale crest-to-crest spacings abound on the Martian surface but are not found in terrestrial sandy deserts. Along its traverse through the Bagnold Dune Field, the Curiosity rover witnessed a rich diversity of such large ripples, both in terms of their shape and of their behavior. Rover observations help understand how these mysterious large Martian ripples form. Here we present a unifying view of ripples that form when grains are mobilized near the sediment bed by various fluids and across planets. Such an understanding of the formation mechanics of similar ripples will enable scientists to use the ripples' imprints on landscapes and in rocks to infer modern and past environmental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available