4.7 Article

The impact of an intense summer cyclone on 2012 Arctic sea ice retreat

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 720-726

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/grl.50190

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF Office of Polar Programs
  2. Office of Naval Research
  3. NASA Cryosphere Program
  4. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1021274, 1203258, 1022475, 856177] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1203506, 0908769, 1313647] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This model study examines the impact of an intense early August cyclone on the 2012 record low Arctic sea ice extent. The cyclone passed when Arctic sea ice was thin and the simulated Arctic ice volume had already declined similar to 40% from the 2007-2011 mean. The thin sea ice pack and the presence of ocean heat in the near surface temperature maximum layer created conditions that made the ice particularly vulnerable to storms. During the storm, ice volume decreased about twice as fast as usual, owing largely to a quadrupling in bottom melt caused by increased upward ocean heat transport. This increased ocean heat flux was due to enhanced mixing in the oceanic boundary layer, driven by strong winds and rapid ice movement. A comparison with a sensitivity simulation driven by reduced wind speeds during the cyclone indicates that cyclone-enhanced bottom melt strongly reduces ice extent for about 2 weeks, with a declining effect afterward. The simulated Arctic sea ice extent minimum in 2012 is reduced by the cyclone but only by 0.15 x 10(6) km(2) (4.4%). Thus, without the storm, 2012 would still have produced a record minimum. Citation: Zhang J., R. Lindsay, A. Schweiger, and M. Steele (2013), The impact of an intense summer cyclone on 2012 Arctic sea ice retreat, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 720-726, doi:10.1002/grl.50190.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available