4.7 Article

Generic dependence of the frequency-size distribution of earthquakes on depth and its relation to the strength profile of the crust

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 709-714

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012GL054198

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI)
  2. Swiss National Foundation (SNF) [PMPDP2 134174]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PMPDP2_134174] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explore the idea that the relative size distribution of earthquakes, quantified using the so-called b-value, is negatively correlated with differential stress. Because the maximum possible differential stress increases linearly in the brittle upper crust, we expect to find a decrease of b with depth. We test this expectation for seven continental areas around the world, each of which is described by a regional earthquake catalog. We find a monotonic decrease in b-value between 5 and 15 km depth. The decrease stops near the brittle-ductile transition. We specifically focus on the high-quality catalogs of earthquakes in California to perform a sensitivity test with respect to depth uncertainty; we also estimate the probability-depth gradient for the occurrence of a target magnitude event and study the behavior of b with depth in near- and off-fault zones. We also translate the observed b-depth gradients into b-differential stress gradients. Our findings suggest that b-values are negatively correlated with differential stress and hus have the potential to act as stress meters in the Earth's crust. Citation: Spada, M., T. Tormann, S. Wiemer, and B. Enescu (2013), Generic dependence of the frequency-size distribution of earthquakes on depth and its relation to the strength profile of the crust, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 709-714, doi:10.1029/2012GL054198.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available