4.7 Article

Initiation of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet and estimates of total Antarctic ice volume in the earliest Oligocene

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 40, Issue 16, Pages 4305-4309

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/grl.50797

Keywords

Antarctic; ice sheet; Oligocene

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [0342484]
  2. ANDRILL Science Management Office at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, as part of the ANDRILL U.S. Science Support Program
  3. NSF [ANT-0424589, 143018, OCE-1202632]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council UK [NE/J018333/1]
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/J018333/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. NERC [NE/J018333/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [1203910] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  10. Directorate For Geosciences [1203792] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reconstructions of Antarctic paleotopography for the late Eocene suggest that glacial erosion and thermal subsidence have lowered West Antarctic elevations considerably since then, with Antarctic land area having decreased similar to 20%. A new climate-ice sheet model based on these reconstructions shows that the West Antarctic Ice Sheet first formed at the Eocene-Oligocene transition (33.8-33.5Ma, E-O) in concert with the continental-scale expansion of the East Antarctica Ice Sheet and that the total volume of East and West Antarctic ice (33.4-35.9x10(6)km(3)) was >1.4 times greater than previously assumed. This larger modeled ice volume is consistent with a modest cooling of 1-2 degrees C in the deep ocean during the E-O transition, lower than other estimates of similar to 3 degrees C cooling, and suggests the possibility of substantial ice in the Antarctic interior before the Eocene-Oligocene boundary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available