4.7 Article

Classifying reanalysis surface temperature probability density functions (PDFs) over North America with cluster analysis

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 40, Issue 14, Pages 3710-3714

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/grl.50688

Keywords

surface temperature PDFs; cluster analysis; reanalysis; North America

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. NSF [ExArch 1125798]
  3. NOAA [NA11OAR4310099]
  4. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station Hatch grant [NJ07102]
  5. NASA National Climate Assessment project [11-NCA11-0028]
  6. NASA AIST project [AIST-QRS-12-0002]
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1125798] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [1102838] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An important step in projecting future climate change impacts on extremes involves quantifying the underlying probability distribution functions (PDFs) of climate variables. However, doing so can prove challenging when multiple models and large domains are considered. Here an approach to PDF quantification using k-means clustering is considered. A standard clustering algorithm (with k=5 clusters) is applied to 33years of daily January surface temperature from two state-of-the-art reanalysis products, the North American Regional Reanalysis and the Modern Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications. The resulting cluster assignments yield spatially coherent patterns that can be broadly related to distinct climate regimes over North America, e.g., low variability over the tropical oceans or temperature advection across stronger or weaker gradients. This technique has the potential to be a useful and intuitive tool for evaluation of model-simulated PDF structure and could provide insight into projections of future changes in temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available