4.7 Article

Earthquake source parameters from GPS-measured static displacements with potential for real-time application

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 60-65

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012GL054209

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA Advanced Information Systems Technology project at Scripps [NNX09AI67G]
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H527791/1]
  3. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [854.10.002]
  4. [NE/B505997/1]
  5. NERC [NE/H527791/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. NASA [NNX09AI67G, 117396] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe a method for determining an optimal centroid-moment tensor solution of an earthquake from a set of static displacements measured using a network of Global Positioning System receivers. Using static displacements observed after the 4 April 2010, M-W 7.2 El Mayor-Cucapah, Mexico, earthquake, we perform an iterative inversion to obtain the source mechanism and location, which minimize the least-squares difference between data and synthetics. The efficiency of our algorithm for forward modeling static displacements in a layered elastic medium allows the inversion to be performed in real-time on a single processor without the need for precomputed libraries of excitation kernels; we present simulated real-time results for the El Mayor-Cucapah earthquake. The only a priori information that our inversion scheme needs is a crustal model and approximate source location, so the method proposed here may represent an improvement on existing early warning approaches that rely on foreknowledge of fault locations and geometries. Citation: O'Toole, T. B., A. P. Valentine, and J. H. Woodhouse (2013), Earthquake source parameters from GPS-measured static displacements with potential for real-time application, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 60-65, doi: 10.1029/2012GL054209.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available