4.7 Article

Lake-size dependency of wind shear and convection as controls on gas exchange

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012GL051886

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DEB-0822700, MCB-0702395, DBI-0446017, DBI-0639229]
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [1182]
  3. NSF [DGE-0903560, DEB-0743192, DEB-9306978, OCE 0235238, DEB 0640953]
  4. University of Nebraska Water Resources Research Initiative
  5. Archbold Biological Station (AN)
  6. Trophic Cascade Project, UW-Madison, U Virginia, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
  7. University of Michigan Ocean Engineering Laboratory (DG)
  8. Erken Laboratory
  9. Marine Institute, Co. Mayo, Ireland
  10. Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Christopher McConnell
  11. German Ministry of Science and Education
  12. Israeli Ministry of Science and Technology
  13. Lacawac Sanctuary Foundation (LC)
  14. U.S. Geological Survey (MA)
  15. Leibniz-Institut fur Gewasserokologie und Binnenfischerei (MU)
  16. N.Z. Ministry for Science and Innovation [UOWX0505]
  17. Bay of Plenty Regional Council (RT, WA)
  18. Lake Sunapee Protective Association (SN)
  19. Darren Bade, Kent State University (SY)
  20. Estonian Science Foundation [8729 (VJ)]
  21. Academia Sinica (YYL)
  22. Danish Council for Independent Research
  23. Natural Sciences grant [10-085238 (CA, GS, HS, VS)]
  24. Danish Centre for Lake Restoration (CLEAR)
  25. Division Of Environmental Biology
  26. Direct For Biological Sciences [0919603, 0941510] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-frequency physical observations from 40 temperate lakes were used to examine the relative contributions of wind shear (u(*)) and convection (w(*)) to turbulence in the surface mixed layer. Seasonal patterns of u(*) and w(*) were dissimilar; u(*) was often highest in the spring, while w(*) increased throughout the summer to a maximum in early fall. Convection was a larger mixed-layer turbulence source than wind shear (u(*)/w(*) < 0.75) for 18 of the 40 lakes, including all 11 lakes < 10 ha. As a consequence, the relative contribution of convection to the gas transfer velocity (k, estimated by the surface renewal model) was greater for small lakes. The average k was 0.54 m day(-1) for lakes < 10 ha. Because u(*) and w(*) differ in temporal pattern and magnitude across lakes, both convection and wind shear should be considered in future formulations of lake-air gas exchange, especially for small lakes. Citation: Read, J. S., et al. (2012), Lake-size dependency of wind shear and convection as controls on gas exchange, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09405, doi:10.1029/2012GL051886.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available