4.7 Article

Flux of carbonate melt from deeply subducted pelitic sediments: Geophysical and geochemical implications for the source of Central American volcanic arc

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012GL052606

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [OCE-0841035]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences [0841035] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We determined the fluid-present and fluid-absent near-solidus melting of an Al-poor carbonated pelite at 3-7 GPa, to constrain the possible influence of sediment melt in subduction zones. Hydrous silicate melt is produced at the solidi at 3-4 GPa whereas Na-K-rich carbonatite is produced at the solidi at >= 5 GPa for both starting compositions. At >= 5 GPa and 1050 degrees C, immiscible carbonate and silicate melts appear with carbonate melt forming isolated pockets embedded in silicate melt. Application of our data to Nicaraguan slab suggests that sediment melting may not occur at sub-arc depth (similar to 170 km) but carbonatite production can occur atop slab or by diapiric rise of carbonated-silicate melange zone to the mantle wedge at similar to 200-250 km depth. Flux of carbonatite to shallower arc-source can explain the geochemistry of Nicaraguan primary magma (low SiO2 and high CaO, Ba/La). Comparison of carbonate-silicate melt immiscibility field with mantle wedge thermal structure suggests that carbonatite might temporally be trapped in viscous silicate melt, and contribute to seismic low-velocity zone at deep mantle wedge of Nicaragua. Citation: Tsuno, K., R. Dasgupta, L. Danielson, and K. Righter (2012), Flux of carbonate melt from deeply subducted pelitic sediments: Geophysical and geochemical implications for the source of Central American volcanic arc, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L16307, doi: 10.1029/2012GL052606.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available