4.7 Article

Tsunamigenic ionospheric hole

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011GL050159

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture
  2. Observation and Research Program for Prediction of Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions
  3. Heiwa Nakajima Foundation
  4. National Science Council of the National Central University [NSC 98-2116-M-008-006-MY3]
  5. Earth Observation Research Center, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
  6. [21710180]
  7. [20510171]
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21253005] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traveling ionospheric disturbances generated by an epicentral ground/sea surface motion, ionospheric disturbances associated with Rayleigh-waves as well as post-seismic 4-minute monoperiodic atmospheric resonances and other-period atmospheric oscillations have been observed in large earthquakes. In addition, a giant tsunami after the subduction earthquake produces an ionospheric hole which is widely a sudden depletion of ionospheric total electron content (TEC) in the hundred kilometer scale and lasts for a few tens of minutes over the tsunami source area. The tsunamigenic ionospheric hole detected by the TEC measurement with Global Position System (GPS) was found in the 2011 M9.0 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku, the 2010 M8.8 Chile, and the 2004 M9.1 Sumatra earthquakes. This occurs because plasma is descending at the lower thermosphere where the recombination of ions and electrons is high through the meter-scale downwelling of sea surface at the tsunami source area, and is highly depleted due to the chemical processes. Citation: Kakinami, Y., M. Kamogawa, Y. Tanioka, S. Watanabe, A.R. Gusman, J.-Y. Liu, Y. Watanabe, and T. Mogi (2012), Tsunamigenic ionospheric hole, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L00G27, doi: 10.1029/2011GL050159.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available