4.7 Article

Effects of subducted seamounts on megathrust earthquake nucleation and rupture propagation

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012GL053892

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [EAR-1015221]
  2. WHOI Deep Ocean Exploration Institute [27071150, 25051162]
  3. Division Of Earth Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1015221] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Subducted seamounts have been linked to interplate earthquakes, but their specific effects on earthquake mechanism remain controversial. A key question is under what conditions a subducted seamount will generate or stop megathrust earthquakes. Here we show results from numerical experiments in the framework of rate-and state-dependent friction law in which a seamount is characterized as a patch of elevated effective normal stress on the thrust interface. We find that whether subducted seamounts generate or impede megathrust earthquakes depends critically on their relative locations to the earthquake nucleation zone defined by depth-variable friction parameters. A seamount may act as a rupture barrier and such barrier effect is most prominent when the seamount sits at an intermediate range of the seamount-to-trench distances (20-100% of the nucleation-zone-to-trench distance). Moreover, we observe that seamount-induced barriers can turn into asperities on which megathrust earthquakes can nucleate at shallow depths and rupture the entire seismogenic zone. These results suggest that a strong barrier patch may not necessarily reduce the maximum size of earthquakes. Instead, the barrier could experience large coseismic slip when it is ruptured. Citation: Yang, H., Y. Liu, and J. Lin (2012), Effects of subducted seamounts on megathrust earthquake nucleation and rupture propagation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L24302, doi: 10.1029/2012GL053892.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available