4.7 Article

The impact of detailed urban-scale processing on the composition, distribution, and radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011GL047417

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE [DE-FG02-94ER61937]
  2. U.S. NSF [AGS-0944121]
  3. Singapore National Research Foundation (NRF) through the Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART) Center for Environmental Sensing and Monitoring (CENSAM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detailed urban-scale processing has not been included in global 3D chemical transport models due to its large computational demands. Here we present a metamodel for including this processing, and compare it with the use of the traditional approach of dilution of emissions into large grid boxes. This metamodel is used in a global 3D model to simulate the effects of cities around the world on aerosol chemistry, physics, and radiative effects at the global scale. We show that the biases caused by ignoring urban processing on the global values of total aerosol surface concentration, the total aerosol column abundance, the aerosol optical depth (AOD), the absorbing aerosol optical depth (AAOD), and the top of the atmosphere radiative forcing (TOA) respectively are +26 +/- (2)(3)%, +51 +/- (12)(10)%, +42 +/- (10)(8)%, +8 +/- (18)(16)%, and -0.27 +/- (0.10)(0.14) W/m(2). These results show that failure to consider urban scale processing leads to significantly more negative aerosol radiative forcing compared to when detailed urban scale processing is considered. Citation: Cohen, J. B., R. G. Prinn, and C. Wang (2011), The impact of detailed urban-scale processing on the composition, distribution, and radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L10808, doi: 10.1029/2011GL047417.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available