4.7 Article

How is the ocean filled?

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011GL046769

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [0645936, OCE-0960787]
  2. J. Lamar Worzel Assistant Scientist Fund
  3. Penzance Endowed Fund in Support of Assistant Scientists
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences [0645936, 0960787] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ocean surface rapidly exchanges heat, freshwater, and gases with the atmosphere, but once water sinks into the ocean interior, the inherited properties of seawater are closely conserved. Previous water-mass decompositions have described the oceanic interior as being filled by just a few different property combinations, or water masses. Here we apply a new inversion technique to climatological tracer distributions to find the pathways by which the ocean is filled from over 10,000 surface regions, based on the discretization of the ocean surface at 2 degrees by 2 degrees resolution. The volume of water originating from each surface location is quantified in a global framework, and can be summarized by the estimate that 15% of the surface area fills 85% of the ocean interior volume. Ranked from largest to smallest, the volume contributions scaled by surface area follow a power-law distribution with an exponent of -1.09 +/- 0.03 that appears indicative of the advective-diffusive filling characteristics of the ocean circulation, as demonstrated using a simple model. This work quantifies the connection between the surface and interior ocean, allowing insight into ocean composition, atmosphere-ocean interaction, and the transient response of the ocean to a changing climate. Citation: Gebbie, G., and P. Huybers (2011), How is the ocean filled?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L06604, doi: 10.1029/2011GL046769.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available