4.7 Article

Global particulate matter pool temporal variability over the SeaWiFS period (1997-2007)

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2010GL046167

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Major patterns of temporal variability associated with marine particulate backscattering coefficient at 490 nm (b(bp)(490), an indicator of the particulate organic carbon concentration) and particle backscattering spectral dependency gamma (a proxy for the relative proportion between small and large particles) are investigated with a 10-year SeaWiFS series. Generally, the contribution of the seasonal cycle to the series variance has a similar spatial pattern for gamma and the chlorophyll a concentration (Chla). The spatial distribution of significant monotonic changes for gamma and Chla (reaching up to +/- 5% yr(-1)) is also comparable with opposite signs of the slope, indicating that inter-annual changes in Chla and average particle size are often positively correlated. Conversely, spatial patterns of seasonality and trend found for b(bp)(490) often differ from those of Chla and gamma. Particularly, large seasonal signals for b(bp)(490) are seen poleward of 45 while high seasonality for Chla and gamma is found in two mid-latitude zonal belts (similar to 20 degrees-40 degrees latitude). Significant changes in b(bp)(490) over the considered decade are much fewer and usually not significant in areas where strong positive or negative changes in Chla have been detected. This suggests that the changes in phytoplankton have not been translated in terms of overall particle stock. Citation: Vantrepotte, V., H. Loisel, F. Melin, D. Desailly, and L. Duforet-Gaurier (2011), Global particulate matter pool temporal variability over the SeaWiFS period (1997-2007), Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L02605, doi: 10.1029/2010GL046167.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available