4.7 Article

Open ocean gas transfer velocity derived from long-term direct measurements of the CO2 flux

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2010GL045597

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F007442/1, NE/C001826/1, NE/C001869/1, NE/C001834/1, NE/G000115/1, NE/G000123/1, NE/G003696/1, Oceans 2025]
  2. NERC [NE/G000123/1, NE/G003696/1, NE/G000115/1, NE/G00353X/1, NE/C001826/1, NE/C001869/1, noc010003, noc010013] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C001869/1, NE/G000123/1, NE/G003696/1, NE/C001826/1, NE/C001834/1, noc010012, NE/C001702/1, noc010003, noc010013, NE/G000115/1, NE/G00353X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Air-sea open ocean CO2 flux measurements have been made using the Eddy Covariance (EC) technique onboard the weathership Polarfront in the North Atlantic between September 2006 and December 2009. Flux measurements were made using an autonomous system 'AutoFlux'. CO2 mass density was measured with an open-path infrared gas analyzer. Following quality control procedures, 3938 20-minute flux measurements were made at mean wind speeds up to 19.6 m/s, significantly higher wind speeds than previously published results. The uncertainty in the determination of gas transfer velocities is large, but the mean relationship to wind speed allows a new parameterisation of the gas transfer velocity to be determined. A cubic dependence of gas transfer on wind speed is found, suggesting a significant influence of bubble-mediated exchange on gas transfer. Citation: Prytherch, J., M. J. Yelland, R. W. Pascal, B. I. Moat, I. Skjelvan, and M. A. Srokosz (2010), Open ocean gas transfer velocity derived from long-term direct measurements of the CO2 flux, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L23607, doi:10.1029/2010GL045597.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available