4.7 Article

September 2005 mega-dike emplacement in the Manda-Harraro nascent oceanic rift (Afar depression)

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2009GL039605

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NERC Afar Rift Consortium [NE/E007414/1]
  2. NERC fellowship [NE/E013945/1]
  3. Royal Society fellowship [EAR-0635789, EAR-0635898]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E013945/1, NE/E007414/1, NE/D008611/1, come20001, earth010007] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [come20001, NE/E007414/1, NE/E013945/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Local and regional seismic data constrain the space-time history of deformation and likely magma sources for the September 2005 diking episode in the Manda-Harraro rift zone of the Afar depression. The results distinguish three centers from which subhorizontal dike propagation progressed: two distinct sources around the Dabbahu-Gab'ho Volcanic Complex (DVC) and the third at the Ado'Ale Volcanic Complex (AVC). The temporal development of seismicity shows that the majority of the dike volume is fed from beneath AVC and migrated laterally with an average rate of 15-30 cm/sec. This dike emplacement at a divergent plate boundary is unusual due to the rapid intrusion of a large volume of magma and the large amount of seismic moment release. We interpret this volcano-tectonic crisis as a complex interaction of multiple magma plumbing sources and lithosphere at a plate boundary under extension. Such repeated episodes will eventually shape the incipient oceanic rift morphology. Citation: Ayele, A., D. Keir, C. Ebinger, T. J. Wright, G. W. Stuart, W. R. Buck, E. Jacques, G. Ogubazghi, and J. Sholan (2009), September 2005 mega-dike emplacement in the Manda-Harraro nascent oceanic rift (Afar depression), Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L20306, doi: 10.1029/2009GL039605.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available