4.7 Article

Cold decade (AD 1810-1819) caused by Tambora (1815) and another (1809) stratospheric volcanic eruption

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2009GL040882

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [0087151, 0337933, 0538553, 0612461, 0338363, 0612422]
  2. French Polar Institute (IPEV)
  3. Institut National des Sciences de l'Univers (INSU)
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [0612461] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [0337933, 0612422, 0338363, 0087151, 0538553] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate records indicate that the decade of AD 1810-1819 including the year without a summer'' (1816) is probably the coldest during the past 500 years or longer, and the cause of the climatic extreme has been attributed primarily to the 1815 cataclysmic Tambora eruption in Indonesia. But the cold temperatures in the early part of the decade and the timing of the Tambora eruption call into question the real climatic impact of volcanic eruptions. Here we present new evidence, based on sulfur isotope anomaly (Delta S-33), a unique indicator of volcanic sulfuric acid produced in the stratosphere and preserved in polar snow, and on the precise timing of the volcanic deposition in both polar regions, that another large eruption in 1809 of a volcano is also stratospheric and occurred in the tropics. The Tambora eruption and the undocumented 1809 eruption are together responsible for the unusually cold decade. Citation: Cole-Dai, J., D. Ferris, A. Lanciki, J. Savarino, M. Baroni, and M. H. Thiemens (2009), Cold decade (AD 1810-1819) caused by Tambora (1815) and another (1809) stratospheric volcanic eruption, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L22703, doi:10.1029/2009GL040882.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available