4.7 Article

Crustal structure across Longmenshan fault belt from passive source seismic profiling

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2009GL039580

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-YW-132]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [40721003, 40830315]
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C004574/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyse receiver functions from 29 broad-band seismographs along a 380-km profile across the Longmenshan (LMS) fault belt to determine crustal structure beneath the east Tibetan margin and Sichuan basin. The Moho deepens from about 50 km under Songpan-Ganzi in east Tibet to about 60 km beneath the LMS and then shallows to about 35 km under the western Sichuan basin. The average crustal Vp/Vs ratios vary in the range 1.75-1.88 under Songpan-Ganzi in east Tibet, 1.8-2.0 under the LMS, and decrease systematically across the NW part of the Sichuan basin to less than 1.70. A negative phase arrival above the Moho under Songpan-Ganzi and Sichuan basin is interpreted as a PS conversion from the top of a low-velocity layer in the lower crust. The very high crustal Vp/Vs ratio and negative polarity PS conversion at the top of lower crust in east Tibet are inferred to be seismic signatures of a low-viscosity channel in the eastern margin of the Tibetan plateau. The lateral variation of Moho topography, crustal Vp/Vs ratio and negative polarity PS conversion at the top of the lower crust along the profile seem consistent with a model of lower crust flow or tectonic escape. Citation: Zhang, Z., Y. Wang, Y. Chen, G. A. Houseman, X. Tian, E. Wang, and J. Teng (2009), Crustal structure across Longmenshan fault belt from passive source seismic profiling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L17310, doi:10.1029/2009GL039580.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available