4.6 Article

Joint location and source mechanism inversion of microseismic events: benchmarking on seismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 198, Issue 1, Pages 249-258

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu126

Keywords

Inverse theory; Probability distributions; Wave scattering and diffraction; Fractures and faults

Funding

  1. grant agency of the Czech Republic [P210/12/2451]
  2. programme 'Projects of Large Infrastructure for Research, Development, and Innovations' [LM2010005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seismic monitoring can greatly benefit from imaging events with a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as the number of the events with a low signal grows exponentially. One way to detect weaker events is improvement of a SNR by migration-type stacking of waveforms from multiple stations. We have developed a new method of location of seismic events that involves stacking of seismic phases and amplitudes along diffraction traveltime curves to suppress noise and detect seismic events with a SNR lower than that on individual receivers. The stacking includes polarity correction based on a simultaneous seismic moment tensor inversion and detection algorithm on the stack function. We applied this method to locate microseismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing. First we calibrated the velocity model by locating perforation shots at known locations. Then we processed 3 d of data from microseismic monitoring of shale stimulation and benchmarked migration-type locations of the largest events that were manually located. The detected and located events induced by hydraulic fracturing in this case study are mostly shear events forming narrow bands along the maximum horizontal stress direction approximately 100 m above the injection intervals. The proposed technique is fully automated and feasible for real-time seismic monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available