4.6 Article

The structure of the crust and uppermost mantle beneath South China from ambient noise and earthquake tomography

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 189, Issue 3, Pages 1565-1583

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05423.x

Keywords

Surface waves and free oscillations; Seismic tomography; Crustal structure; Asia

Funding

  1. US NSF-EAR [0944022]
  2. US NSF-OISE [0730154]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41004036]
  4. CAS [kzcx2-yw-142]
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences [0944022] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two years of continuous recordings of ambient seismic noise observed at 354 stations in South China from 2009 to 2010 are used to estimate Rayleigh wave group and phase velocity maps from 6 to 40 s period. These results are merged with Rayleigh wave phase velocity maps from 25 to 70 s period derived from earthquakes in the same time frame. Eikonal tomography generates the dispersion maps, which, by MonteCarlo inversion, are used to estimate a 3-D Vsv model of the crust and upper mantle down to a depth of 150 km across all of South China with attendant uncertainties. A clear image emerges of the West Yangtze Block, a region of the western Yangtze Craton characterized by relatively thick crust (similar to 40 km) overlying a seismic mantle lithosphere that extends to at least 150 km that may have been the nucleus for the formation of the Yangtze craton in the Archean and may present a present-day obstacle to the eastward expansion of Tibet. The West Yangtze Block contrasts with the thinner crust (similar to 30 km) and mantle lithosphere (similar to 7080 km) beneath the eastern Yangtze Craton and South China Foldbelt. These observed differences are consistent with processes associated with flat slab subduction in the Mesozoic that may have eroded the lithosphere of the eastern Yangtze Craton and the South China Foldbelt.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available