4.6 Article

Real-time observation of an active debris flow watershed in the Wenchuan Earthquake area

Journal

GEOMORPHOLOGY
Volume 321, Issue -, Pages 153-166

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.08.024

Keywords

Debris flow; Monitoring; Discharge; Velocity; Rainfall threshold; Wenchuan Earthquake

Funding

  1. National Research Project [2017YFC1502504]
  2. International S&T Cooperation Project [2016YFE0122400]
  3. Open Fund [SKLGP2017K013]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Debris flows occur frequently and cause considerable damage in the Wenchuan Earthquake area; however, there has been no systematic real-time monitoring of such events. This study used a monitoring system to consider the spatial variation of meteorological and flow processes in a 39.4 km(2) watershed. The system comprised three rainfall gauges at different locations, and three hydrological monitoring stations, located on the mainstream and tributaries, with instruments to measure the velocity, height, and density of debris flows. Based on the monitoring data, the debris flow events were categorized and the general runoff velocity, discharge, and density were analysed. We proposed empirical methods for estimating the velocity and the total volume of debris flows based on other easily obtainable parameters, e.g., maximum flow depth and duration. Comparison of the results derived using the monitoring data and empirical formulas with those obtained in other small watersheds worldwide revealed the debris flow characteristics in this relatively large watershed. Rainfall threshold for the debris flows was proposed, which is higher than those proposed for the same region for periods shortly after the Wenchuan Earthquake (2008 similar to 2013), and the temporal evolution of the rainfall conditions necessary for debris flows was addressed. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available