4.6 Article

Wind regimes and aeolian transport in the Great Basin, U.S.A.

Journal

GEOMORPHOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue 1-2, Pages 1-13

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.01.005

Keywords

Aeolian transport; Dunes; Climatology

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-9809241]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The modern Great Basin of the interior western United States is characterized by surface winds with considerable spatial and temporal variabilities. Wind records from the second half of the 20th century for 12 Great Basin localities, analyzed with standard aeolian-sediment transport methods developed elsewhere in the world, reflect this complexity. The drift potential (DP) for aeolian deposits is generally moderate (DP 200400) in the western Great Basin and weak (DP < 200) in the central Great Basin where winds are predominantly west-southwesterly. DP is relatively high (DP > 300) at the eastern edge of the Great Basin where the dominant prevailing wind direction is south-southwesterly. Both DP and resultant drift direction (RDD) are consistent with synoptic meteorological observations of the evolution of cold fronts in the Great Basin. Meteorological observations show that effective winds to produce dunes are most commonly the result of late winter-early spring cyclogenesis. There has been considerable temporal variability of DP in the latter half of the 20th century. Most of the Great Basin has experienced decreasing wind strength since 1973, consistent with recent studies of wind strength in North America and elsewhere. Dune morphology matches both localized RDD and temporal variations in DP reasonably well in the Great Basin. The results demonstrate that local topography can have an important influence on wind directionality, thus providing a cautionary note on the interpretation of dune morphology in the paleoclimatic and stratigraphic record. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available