Journal
GEOMORPHOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 3-4, Pages 482-495Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.05.039
Keywords
Grand Canyon; Rim gravels; Canaan Peak-type gravels; Laramide proto-Grand Canyon
Funding
- National Science Foundation
- National Park Service
- Grand Canyon Association,
- National Speleological Society
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The absence of rim gravels north of Grand Canyon and of Canaan Peak-type gravels south of Grand Canyon suggests that a paleocanyon, which intersected the transport of these gravels north and south, may have begun forming in the Laramide in approximately the same position as today's central Grand Canyon. This Laramide-age canyon is envisioned as having flowed generally from the SW to NE; from the Peach Springs Canyon area to Mile 197 where it was captured by karst; then along a N. 60 degrees E joint system to the Kanab Point area where it converged with drainage coming off the west side of the Kaibab arch. From there it flowed north along the west flank of the Kaibab arch to Paleogene Lake Claron. The critical idea suggested by this proposed model is that the modern Colorado River utilized Laramide paleotopography in establishing its course through the central Grand Canyon, with younger sections of the canyon integrating with it later, in the middle to late Miocene. This paleocanyon route, in association with headward erosion from the Grand Wash Cliffs toward the Kaibab arch after 16-17 Ma, helps account for the total volume of rock eroded from Grand Canyon, which cannot be explained by present-day incision rates. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available