4.7 Article

10Be in Australasian microtektites compared to tektites: Size and geographic controls

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 9, Pages 803-806

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G45038.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Programma Nazionale di Ricerche in Antartide grant [PNRA16_0029]
  2. Taiwan Ocean Research Institute [MD97-2142]
  3. INSU/CNRS
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche through Projets thematiques d'excellence program for the Equipements d'excellence ASTER-CEREGE action
  5. Institut de recherche pour le developpement
  6. A*MIDEX fundation Pepiniere d'excellence program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High Be-10 contents in tektites reported in literature are taken as evidence of a source material, melted at the impact site, enriched in atmospheric Be-10; i.e., a soil or sediment. In 0.8 Ma Australasian tektites, Be-10 content increases with distance from the putative impact location in Indochina, with geographic averages from 69 x 10(6) atoms/g (Indochina) to 136 x 10(6) atoms/g (Australia). Here we report, for the first time, Be-10 contents in microtektites collected from Antarctica and the South China Sea. We show that microtektites are similar to 30 x 10(6) atoms/g richer in Be-10 than tektites from the same geographic areas. Antarctic microtektites, with an average Be-10 content of 184 x 10(6) atoms/g after correction for in situ production, are the richest impact glass ever measured. The simplest explanation for such systematic size and geographic trends is that the source depth of the melt within the target surface decreases with ejection velocity. Indeed, higher initial kinetic energy implies higher launch distances and higher fragmentation of the ejecta. Antarctic microtektite source depth may tentatively be restricted to the upper tens of centimeters at the impact site. Alternative models invoking a marine or loessic sediment source, or a secondary enrichment in the microtektite (either by atmospheric scavenging, selective fractionation by volatilization, or post-depositional contamination) fail to reproduce the observed relationships.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available