4.7 Article

Transatlantic distribution of the Alaskan White River Ash

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 10, Pages 875-878

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G35945.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
  2. Natural Environment Research Council (UK) [NE/G019851/1, NE/G020272/1, NE/G02006X/1]
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation [0909541, 1204176]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G02006X/1, NE/G020272/1, NE/G019851/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [NE/G02006X/1, NE/G020272/1, NE/G019851/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1204176] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Volcanic ash layers preserved within the geologic record represent precise time markers that correlate disparate depositional environments and enable the investigation of synchronous and/or asynchronous behaviors in Earth system and archaeological sciences. However, it is generally assumed that only exceptionally powerful events, such as supereruptions (>= 450 km(3) of ejecta as dense-rock equivalent; recurrence interval of similar to 10(5) yr), distribute ash broadly enough to have an impact on human society, or allow us to address geologic, climatic, and cultural questions on an intercontinental scale. Here we use geochemical, age, and morphological evidence to show that the Alaskan White River Ash (eastern lobe; A.D. 833-850) correlates to the AD860B ash (A.D. 846-848) found in Greenland and northern Europe. These occurrences represent the distribution of an ash over 7000 km, linking marine, terrestrial, and ice-core records. Our results indicate that tephra from more moderate-size eruptions, with recurrence intervals of similar to 100 yr, can have substantially greater distributions than previously thought, with direct implications for volcanic dispersal studies, correlation of widely distributed proxy records, and volcanic hazard assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available