4.7 Article

Order of magnitude increase in subducted H2O due to hydrated normal faults within the Wadati-Benioff zone

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 207-210

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G34730.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H524722/1]
  2. European Union VERCE project
  3. NERC [NE/H524722/1, NE/F001703/1, NE/I005420/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F001703/1, NE/C000315/1, NE/I005420/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is widely proposed that the oceanic mantle is hydrated by outer rise normal faults, and carries large amounts of water to the deep mantle. However, the extent of oceanic mantle hydration is poorly constrained by existing observations, and is a major source of uncertainty in determining the total water delivered to the mantle. Full waveform modeling of dispersed P-wave arrivals from events deep within the Wadati-Benioff zone of northern Japan shows that hydrated fault zone structures are present at intermediate depths. Analysis of the P-wave coda associated with events 5-35 km below the top of the slab gives an overall indication of the bulk hydration of the subducting oceanic mantle, and can be explained by a 40-km-thick layer that is 17%-31% serpentinized. This suggests that the top of the oceanic mantle is 2.0-3.5 wt% hydrated, subducting 170-318 Tg/m.y. of water per meter of arc beneath northern Japan. This order-of-magnitude increase in the estimated H2O flux in this arc implies that over the age of the Earth, the equivalent of as many as 3.5 present-day oceans of water could be subducted along the Kuril and Izu-Bonin arcs alone. These results offer the first direct measure of the lower lithosphere hydration at intermediate depths, and suggest that regassing of the mantle is more vigorous than has previously been proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available