4.7 Article

Frictional properties and sliding stability of the San Andreas fault from deep drill core

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 8, Pages 759-762

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G33007.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-054570, EAR-0746192, OCE-0648331]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Division Of Earth Sciences [0950517, 1045825] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The strength of tectonic faults and the processes that control earthquake rupture remain central questions in fault mechanics and earthquake science. We report on the frictional strength and constitutive properties of intact samples across the main creeping strand of the San Andreas fault (SAF; California, United States) recovered by deep drilling. We find that the fault is extremely weak (friction coefficient, mu = similar to 0.10), and exhibits both velocity strengthening frictional behavior and anomalously low rates of frictional healing, consistent with aseismic creep. In contrast, wall rock to the northeast shows velocity weakening frictional behavior and positive healing rates, consistent with observed repeating earthquakes on nearby fault strands. We also document a sharp increase in strength to values of mu > similar to 0.40 over <1 m distance at the boundary between the fault and adjacent wall rock. The friction values for the SAF are sufficiently low to explain its apparent weakness as inferred from heat flow and stress orientation data. Our results may also indicate that the shear strength of the SAF should remain approximately constant at similar to 10 MPa in the upper 5-8 km, rather than increasing linearly with depth, as is commonly assumed. Taken together, our data explain why the main strand of the SAF in central California is weak, extremely localized, and exhibits aseismic creep, while nearby fault strands host repeating earthquakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available