4.7 Article

Possible early foraminiferans in post-Sturtian (716-635 Ma) cap carbonates

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 67-70

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G32535.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-0843358]
  2. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) Brazil [GDE-200853/2007-4]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Astrobiology Institute
  4. European Community [226354]
  5. UK Natural Environment Research Council
  6. NERC [noc010004, noc010009] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [noc010004, noc010009] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Foraminifera are an ecologically important group of modern heterotrophic amoeboid eukaryotes whose naked and testate ancestors are thought to have evolved similar to 1 Ga ago. However, the single-chambered agglutinated tests of these protists appear in the fossil record only after ca. 580 Ma, coinciding with the appearance of macroscopic and mineralized animals. Here we report the discovery of small, slender tubular microfossils in the Sturtian (ca. 716-635 Ma) cap carbonate of the Rasthof Formation in Namibia. The tubes are 200-1300 mu m long and 20-70 mu m wide, and preserve apertures and variably wide lumens, folds, constrictions, and ridges. Their sometimes flexible walls are composed of carbonaceous material and detrital minerals. This combination of morphological and compositional characters is also present in some species of modern single-chambered agglutinated tubular foraminiferans, and is not found in other agglutinated eukaryotes. The preservation of possible early Foraminifera in the carbonate rocks deposited in the immediate aftermath of Sturtian low-latitude glaciation indicates that various morphologically modern protists thrived in microbially dominated ecosystems, and contributed to the cycling of carbon in Neoproterozoic oceans much before the rise of complex animals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available