4.7 Article

Low marine sulfate concentrations and the isolation of the European epicontinental sea during the Early Jurassic

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 7-10

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G31326.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/D011558/1, NE/C000854/1]
  2. University of Leeds Bursary
  3. Royal Society
  4. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (Academia Sinica) [KZCX2-SW-129]
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C000854/1, NE/D011558/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. NERC [NE/D011558/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two records of seawater sulfate isotope composition from the Early Jurassic demonstrate that large isotopic gradients existed between the European epicontinental sea and the open Tethys Ocean. These differences can be explained by the modifi cation of open-ocean sulfate isotopic compositions by water-mass isolation, sea-level rise, and the effects of changing regional weathering and pyrite burial fl uxes, during a time of rapid environmental change. Both records contain large positive isotopic excursions. In the section from Europe (Yorkshire, UK), a 6 parts per thousand excursion begins in the early exaratum subzone of the Toarcian in the middle of the organic-rich shale representing a well-known oceanic anoxic event. An open Tethyan margin record from Tibet records a much larger 19 parts per thousand excursion, but the section is less well dated. Two age interpretations are possible: sparse biostrati-graphic evidence places this excursion in the Aalenian, but we suggest that it may correlate with the positive excursion in Yorkshire. Hence these records may document both a Toarcian event and an Aalenian sulfur isotope event, or the early Toarcian anoxic event alone. Conservative estimates of the rate of isotopic change with time based on the Tibetan section suggest that Early Jurassic seawater sulfate concentrations were between 1 and 5 mM, much lower than previously thought.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available