4.7 Article

Using meteoric Be-10 to track fluvial sand through the Waipaoa River basin, New Zealand

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 47-50

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G30395.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [BCS-0317530]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use meteoric Be-10 measured in 24 fluvial sand samples collected along the mainstem and from prominent tributaries within the tectonically active Waipaoa River basin, New Zealand, to identify sediment sources and monitor the mixing of sediment as it travels from headwater basins to file sea. Deforestation for agriculture beginning in the early 1900s resulted in severe, but nonuniformly distributed erosion. Tributaries in the northern headwaters, where large amphitheater gullies that continually feed prodigious amounts of deeply sourced sediment to the mainstem are prevalent, yield exceptionally low concentrations of meteoric Be-10 (similar to 1.5 x 10(6) atoms g(-1)). In the more stable eastern and western tributaries, concentrations of meteoric Be-10 are nearly an order of magnitude greater (similar to 14 x 10(6) atoms g(-1)). Meteoric Be-10 concentrations in samples collected along the mainstem above and below tributary confluences steadily and regularly increase downstream (R-2 = 0.92) as large amounts of low-concentration gully-derived sediments are augmented with higher concentration sediment from more stable tributaries, providing strong evidence that meteoric Be-10 concentrations reflect sediment sourcing in this fluvial network. A two-component mixing model indicates that the gullied northern region of the Waipaoa basin produces sediment at a rate similar to 20 times that of the eastern and western regions. These results suggest that meteoric Be-10, in contrast to the widely applied in situ technique that is limited by the availability and distribution of quartz, is an effective tool for the rapid assessment of sediment dynamics and movement within a wide range of fluvial networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available