4.7 Article

Joint mineral physics and seismic wave traveltime analysis of upper mantle temperature

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 363-366

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G25428A.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology/Data Management System (IRIS/DMC)
  2. Northern California Earthquake Data Center
  3. Southern California Earthquake Data Center
  4. National Science Foundation [EAR-0609763]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We employ a new thermodynamic method for self-consistent computation of compositional and thermal effects on phase transition depths, density, and seismic velocities. Using these profiles, we compare theoretical and observed differential traveltimes between P410s and P (T-410) and between P600s and P410s (T660-410) that are affected only by seismic structure in the upper mantle. The anticorrelation between T-410 and T660-410 suggests that variations in T-410 and T660-410 of similar to 8 s are due to lateral temperature variations in the upper mantle transition zone of similar to 400 K. If the mantle is a mechanical mixture of basaltic and harzburgitic components, our traveltime data suggest that the mantle has an average temperature of 1600 +/- 50 K, in agreement with temperature estimates from magma compositions of mid-ocean ridge basalts. We infer a 100 K hotter mantle if we assume the mantle to have a homogeneous pyrolitic composition. The transition-zone temperature beneath hotspots and within subduction zones is relatively high and low, respectively. However, the largest variability in T-410 and T660-410 is recorded by global stations far from subduction zones and hotspots. This indicates that the 400 K variation in upper mantle temperature is complicated by tilted upwellings, slab flattening and accumulation, ancient subduction, and processes unrelated to present-day subduction and plume ascent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available