4.7 Article

A new constraint on the antiquity of anaerobic oxidation of methane: Late Pennsylvanian seep limestones from southern Namibia

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 543-546

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G24690A.1

Keywords

anaerobic oxidation; methane; archaea; sulfate-reducing bacteria; seeps; isoprenoids; limestones

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Late Pennsylvanian seep limestones (ca. 300 Ma) enclosed in the Ganigobis shales in southern Namibia formed by microbial activity. The process that induced carbonate precipitation was the anaerobic oxidation of methane. The presence of C-13-depleted pentamethylicosane (PMI) (-113 parts per thousand) and a mixture of crocetane and phytane (-112 parts per thousand) in concert with similarly C-13-depleted pseudohomologous series of regular isoprenoids reveals that methanotrophic archaea oxidized methane anaerobically at the ancient seep site. Biphytane and a C-39 pseudohomologue are other archaeal molecular fossils with delta C-13 values of -99 parts per thousand and -97 parts per thousand, respectively. The former presence of sulfate-reducing bacteria as the syntrophic partners of methanotrophic archaea in the anaerobic oxidation of methane is indicated by isotopically depleted iso- and anteiso-alkanes. These compounds most probably derive from non-isoprenoidal monoethers and diethers, synthates of sulfate-reducing bacteria. These findings show that anaerobic oxidation of methane is at least 300 m.y. old, extending the record of this process for similar to 140 m.y. As the molecular fossils of archaea and bacteria are preserved in a product of their own metabolic activity (i.e., methane-derived carbonates with delta C-13 values as low as -51 parts per thousand), the syngenicity of molecular fossils and enclosing deposits is unambiguous. This reveals that microbially formed rocks can represent excellent archives for studying past biogeochernical processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available