4.7 Article

Fluorapatite in the Paleoproterozoic Thelon Basin: Structural-stratigraphic context, in situ ion microprobe U-Pb ages, and fluid-flow history

Journal

GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA BULLETIN
Volume 123, Issue 5-6, Pages 1056-1073

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/B30163.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Program of Earth Sciences Sector, Natural Resources Canada
  2. Geomapping for Energy and Minerals Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fluorapatite cements have been documented at more than 18 localities in the Thelon Basin, Canada, occupying stratigraphic positions from the paleosol below the unconformity to well within the upper parts of the fluvial siliciclastic Thelon Formation. Ion microprobe analyses targeted using cathodoluminescence images to areas of higher uranium content on petrographically characterized cements provide the most precise pin on the timing of meso diagenesis in the northeastern part of the Thelon Basin at 1667 +/- 5 Ma. Expulsion of phosphate-rich basinal brines was associated with development of faults and local breccias in the lower strata where extensive quartz cementation took place before the apatite event. The new data do not support previous interpretations for multiple episodes of fluorapatite cementation within the basin despite the wide range of stratigraphic positions and variations in style of occurrence. The tectonic cause remains speculative, as does the relationship of the fluorapatite cements to the unconformity-style uranium mineralization. Thelon fluorapatite cements are older than those reported in the Athabasca basin, suggesting distinct fluid-flow histories occurred within the two basins. The difference in timing indicates that the basin-wide events that generated the fluids with the chemistry capable of producing fluor apatite cement took place independently but under similar conditions within the Thelon and Athabasca basins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available