4.7 Article

Spatial distribution of metal contamination before and after remediation in the Meza Valley, Slovenia

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 217, Issue -, Pages 135-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.11.011

Keywords

Metal contamination; Geostatistics; Empirical Bayesian kriging; EDTA extraction; Bio-accessibility

Categories

Funding

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [J4-3609, Z1-4272]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Geostatistical technique was used to predicted spatial reduction of metal contamination after applying EDTA-based soil remediation. Soil samples from 268 locations in the Meza Valley, Slovenia with Pb and Zn concentrations up to 8955 and 15518 mg kg(-1) were extracted with the chelating agent ethylenediamine tetraacetate (EDTA). On average, 63 and 22% of Pb and Zn, respectively, were removed with washing solution containing 60 mmol EDTA per kg of soil and 75 and 34% of Pb and Zn with 120 mmol EDTA kg(-1) soil. Spatial structure analysis revealed a good spatial structure and little spatial variation of data, which were further interpolated using Empirical Bayesian kriging to produce a continuous surface of Pb and Zn concentrations before and after remediation. Geostatistical simulations showed that the contaminated area covers 19.4 km(2) and that soil remediation (60 mmol EDTA kg(-1)) has the potential to reduce the area with Pb and Zn above the critical regulatory threshold limit by 91 and 42%, respectively. Validated by pilot-scale remediation trials, soil extractions exhibit little scale-dependency of extraction efficiency. EDTA extraction also significantly reduced the bio-accessibility of toxic metals that remained in the soil after remediation using the unified bio-accessibility method. Pb and Zn concentrations accessible from the simulated intestinal phase were reduced by up to 99 and 96%, respectively. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available