4.7 Article

Biochar impact on Midwestern Mollisols and maize nutrient availability

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 230, Issue -, Pages 340-347

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.04.009

Keywords

Biochar; Soil quality; Allelopathy; Maize yield

Categories

Funding

  1. USDA Agriculture and Food Research Initiative [2011-68005-30411]
  2. National Science Foundation [EPS-1101284]
  3. Office Of The Director
  4. EPSCoR [1101284] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biochar applications have been shown to increase crop yields on acidic and low activity soils in the tropics but fewer positive yield responses have been reported for temperate soils. We hypothesized that even without a yield response, applying biochar to a Midwestern Mollisol could improve soil quality and plant nutrient availability because of the carbon it supplies and its conditioning effect. Eighteen small field plots (23.7 m(2)) on a glacial-till derived soil were established by incorporating 0 to 96 Mg ha(-1) of hardwood biochar to a depth of 30 cm. Several soil quality indicators, plant nutrient availability, uptake, and yield of two consecutive maize (Zea mays L.) crops were monitored. Biochar application significantly increased soil pH, readily available water (RAW) content (defined as volumetric water available between -10 kPa and -100 kPa) and soil organic C (SOC). It decreased bulk density (BD), but had no consistent effect on soil infiltration rates, CEC, or nutrient uptake. Biochar application did increase grain yield during the first year by 11 to 55% following very high stover application rates (3.5 x the typical amount), presumably because biochar mitigated adverse effects of allelochemicals released from the decomposing maize residue. There was no detectable biochar effect on maize yield during the second year when the crop was limited by severe drought. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available