4.7 Article

Detecting graves with methane

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 189, Issue -, Pages 18-27

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.04.012

Keywords

Methane; Soils; Cadavers; Grave soils

Categories

Funding

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To establish whether methane (CH4) biogeochemistry could be useful in detecting graves, we measured soil-atmosphere CH4 fluxes, pore air CH4 concentrations, atmospheric CH4 concentrations near the soil surface, and soil aerobic CH4 consumption and anaerobic CH4 production potentials at a graveyard in southern Quebec. Canada, which contained cadavers of zoo animals buried at least a decade before. Soil CH4 fluxes ranged from small rates of consumption in well-drained, non-grave sites (0 to -2 mg m(-2) d(-1)) to > 30 mg m(-2) d(-1) in suspected graves and wetter sites and > 1500 mg m(-2) d(-1) open gravesites. Pore air CH4 concentrations were sub-ambient in well-drained, non-grave soils, confirming net consumption, whereas concentrations were above ambient around graves. Sampling of air for CH4 concentration just above the soil surface after stable meteorological conditions revealed spatial patterns that were related to the occurrence of graves. There were large variations in the soil aerobic CH4 consumption and anaerobic CH4 production potentials in laboratory incubations, providing evidence of the changes in methanotrophic and methanogenic communities and substrate characteristics promoting increased rates of CH4 consumption and/or production associated with cadaver burial. These results suggest that CH4 biogeochemistry can be useful in detecting graves, though its utility will be heavily dependent on the mass, depth, age and nature of the burials as well as the local environment, such as temperature and especially soil drainage, to separate the effect of cadavers from that of the water table. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available