4.7 Article

Effects of inorganic and organic amendments on the mobility (leachability) of heavy metals in contaminated soil: A sequential extraction study

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 159, Issue 3-4, Pages 335-341

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.08.009

Keywords

Contaminated soil; Heavy metals; Soil amendments; Sequential extraction test; Bioavailability

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [1 M0554]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Six kinds of amendments were added to contaminated soil with the goal to alter the mobility of heavy metals and to modify potential environmental impacts. The following amendments were used at doses ranging from 1 to 5%: two kinds of young brown coals (lignite, oxihumolite) with a high content of humic acids, two commercially available derivatives of humic acids (potassium humate and iron humate), and two inorganic materials (fly ash and natural zeolite). Leachability of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) from untreated and amended soils was studied with the aid of a standardized sequential extraction test (BCR test), Cd was present predominantly in the readily mobilizable (acid extractable) form in the soil; its mobility was reduced effectively after an addition of potassium humate. Cu, Pb and Zn were bound more strongly to the soil matrix. The mobility of Cu was reduced after an addition of inorganic amendments (zeolite and fly ash), whereas potassium humate was effective in the immobilization of Pb. Most of Zn (more than 60%) was bound rather strongly in the residual fraction and its mobility was affected only slightly by the presence of amendments at the concentration levels used in this work. Nevertheless, it was shown that even relatively low doses of amendments may cause a significant re-distribution of heavy metals in soil, which could be employed in the soil remediation. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available