4.7 Article

Distinguishing black carbon from biogenic humic substances in soil clay fractions

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 143, Issue 1-2, Pages 115-122

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.10.025

Keywords

humic substances; soil organic matter; charcoal; black carbon; humification; thermogravimetric analysis; NMR spectroscopy; clay mineralogy; clay-humic complexes

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most models of soil humic substances include a substantial component of aromatic C either as the backbone of humic heteropolymers or as a significant component of supramolecular aggregates of degraded biopolymers. We physically separated coarse (0.2-2.0 mu m e.s.d.), medium (0.02-0.2 mu m e.s.d.), and fine (>0.02 mu m e.s.d.) clay subfractions from three Midwestern soils and characterized the organic material associated with these subfiractions using C-13-CPMAS-NMR, DTG, SEM-EDX, incubations, and radiocarbon age. Most of the C in the coarse clay subtraction was present as discrete particles (0.2-5 mu m as seen in SEM images) of black carbon (BC) and consisted of approximately 60% aromatic C, with the remainder being a mixture of aliphatic, anomeric and carboxylic C. We hypothesize that BC particles were originally charcoal formed during prairie fires. As the BC particles aged in soil their surfaces were oxidized to form carboxylic groups and anomeric and aliphatic C accumulated in the BC particles either by adsorption of dissolved biogenic compounds from the soil solution or by direct deposition of biogenic materials from microbes living within the BC particles. The biogenic soil organic matter was physically separated with the medium and fine clay subtractions and was dominated by aliphatic, anomeric, and carboxylic C. The results indicate that the biogenic humic materials in our soils have little aromatic C, which is inconsistent with the traditional heteropolymer model of humic substances. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available